

Preferred scope
Quote from customguns on 06/20/2023, 15:01What is your preferred scope on your muzzleloader and why is it your preferred scope?
What is your preferred scope on your muzzleloader and why is it your preferred scope?
Quote from Sideshow on 06/21/2023, 05:18Well this isnt what Most prefer but i really like low powered Euro styled scopes . Specifically for lets say a shorter range by smokeless standards maybe 400 to 500 yds max range HUNTING scope i like a 1.5x6x42 or 44mm with a 30mm tube . Most have a 65’fov @100 or more up to 84′ fov @100yds . The low light preformance is just Awesome . Closest thing to night vision a guy can have in my experiance . I like a lit reticle also . At 400yds the difficulty factor is the same as a std rifle sight at 75yds . Same sight picture for both . Im not a guy that wants to cipher which 2 hairs i want to put my bullet between At All . By the same token excellant accuracy is still very much doable for clean game harvests even out there . I sometimes stalk so the close quick target acquisition i find vital for success on a animal thats making tracks . Im a bird hunter all my life so this isnt hard for me to do for deer as well on the move . A scope as ive described really shines for this !!! Im in Michigan so woods plus open areas coverage is the norm for me . Farmland too as well as powerline coverages . I try to put myself when sitting in spots that offer both near and further oportunities if possible . The scopes tend to be only around 20 oz so weight isnt bad for a field gun of a max of 10 lbs preferably under . Hawke has a nice inexpensive model in their Wide Angle 30mm series thats 1.5x6x44 for around $400ish last i looked . Its fairly tough and holds zero too . I like it as its basic .
Ive taken note of a couple of German Precision Optics offering i really like that have the fabulous wide FOV at lower power but have more magnification on the upper end for further shots . One is a 2×12 x 44 x 30mm and the other is a 1.5x9x44x30mm . Both look fabulous as great all around scopes close , far and inbetween for the serious hunter that hunts many various scenarios and looks to do it all effectively . Lighted And Dialable too . Thats my take on my prefered type of scope for this type of higher preforance rifle .
I have a nice 45 thats heavy to carry about but is a nice stationary tower blind or just the regular outhouse type blind as i call them lol .
It wears a 4x16x40 Vortex Diamondback with bdc and works well for that type of hunting or target use for me .
I dont have the wallet as some do for Nightforce or other really fancy scopes anyway . Plus honestly beyond 500 or 600 yds im really not interested in shooting further at anything – paper , steel , and definately not live game . Thats not for me .
If you dont shoot big boomer super high velocity loads you dont need those big dollar scopes . Theres a practicle side to smokeless that mamy dont pursue . This is just one aspect of that thinking .
Well this isnt what Most prefer but i really like low powered Euro styled scopes . Specifically for lets say a shorter range by smokeless standards maybe 400 to 500 yds max range HUNTING scope i like a 1.5x6x42 or 44mm with a 30mm tube . Most have a 65’fov @100 or more up to 84′ fov @100yds . The low light preformance is just Awesome . Closest thing to night vision a guy can have in my experiance . I like a lit reticle also . At 400yds the difficulty factor is the same as a std rifle sight at 75yds . Same sight picture for both . Im not a guy that wants to cipher which 2 hairs i want to put my bullet between At All . By the same token excellant accuracy is still very much doable for clean game harvests even out there . I sometimes stalk so the close quick target acquisition i find vital for success on a animal thats making tracks . Im a bird hunter all my life so this isnt hard for me to do for deer as well on the move . A scope as ive described really shines for this !!! Im in Michigan so woods plus open areas coverage is the norm for me . Farmland too as well as powerline coverages . I try to put myself when sitting in spots that offer both near and further oportunities if possible . The scopes tend to be only around 20 oz so weight isnt bad for a field gun of a max of 10 lbs preferably under . Hawke has a nice inexpensive model in their Wide Angle 30mm series thats 1.5x6x44 for around $400ish last i looked . Its fairly tough and holds zero too . I like it as its basic .
Ive taken note of a couple of German Precision Optics offering i really like that have the fabulous wide FOV at lower power but have more magnification on the upper end for further shots . One is a 2×12 x 44 x 30mm and the other is a 1.5x9x44x30mm . Both look fabulous as great all around scopes close , far and inbetween for the serious hunter that hunts many various scenarios and looks to do it all effectively . Lighted And Dialable too . Thats my take on my prefered type of scope for this type of higher preforance rifle .
I have a nice 45 thats heavy to carry about but is a nice stationary tower blind or just the regular outhouse type blind as i call them lol .
It wears a 4x16x40 Vortex Diamondback with bdc and works well for that type of hunting or target use for me .
I dont have the wallet as some do for Nightforce or other really fancy scopes anyway . Plus honestly beyond 500 or 600 yds im really not interested in shooting further at anything – paper , steel , and definately not live game . Thats not for me .
If you dont shoot big boomer super high velocity loads you dont need those big dollar scopes . Theres a practicle side to smokeless that mamy dont pursue . This is just one aspect of that thinking .
Quote from Sideshow on 06/21/2023, 05:39Wow i dont my edit so i will try this again . Idont have the walet for a fanvy Nightforce big dollsr scope as many do . But i dont try to shoot big boomer warp speed heavy bullet loads either that just destroy lesser scopes . Theres a pacticlity in this if you cant afford those scopes that can handle horrendius recoil . You just dont chase that type of shooting . That works for me .
Wow i dont my edit so i will try this again . Idont have the walet for a fanvy Nightforce big dollsr scope as many do . But i dont try to shoot big boomer warp speed heavy bullet loads either that just destroy lesser scopes . Theres a pacticlity in this if you cant afford those scopes that can handle horrendius recoil . You just dont chase that type of shooting . That works for me .
Quote from customguns on 06/21/2023, 09:27What is the typical load you like to shoot and at what velocity? For myself I consider a medium load as a 300 grain .45 at 2600 fps., but realize not everyone considers a medium load the same thing. Heard some guys call that a light load and others call it heavy. I like the Leupold Mark 4 scopes. Excellent at low light levels and reasonably priced if you catch them on sale. I’ve gotten several on sale at Midway, but right now Midway shows them as discontinued. When I was younger Tasco was about all I could afford. Boscovs sold them in a plastic wrap for about $50. They usually only lasted a few years. When I could afford an upgrade went with Leupold and have found them to be a very good scope for the price. I’ve shot other guys Swarovskis and Nightforces, really nice glass, a little better than Leupold, but I’ve found Leupold plenty good for low light hunting.
What is the typical load you like to shoot and at what velocity? For myself I consider a medium load as a 300 grain .45 at 2600 fps., but realize not everyone considers a medium load the same thing. Heard some guys call that a light load and others call it heavy. I like the Leupold Mark 4 scopes. Excellent at low light levels and reasonably priced if you catch them on sale. I’ve gotten several on sale at Midway, but right now Midway shows them as discontinued. When I was younger Tasco was about all I could afford. Boscovs sold them in a plastic wrap for about $50. They usually only lasted a few years. When I could afford an upgrade went with Leupold and have found them to be a very good scope for the price. I’ve shot other guys Swarovskis and Nightforces, really nice glass, a little better than Leupold, but I’ve found Leupold plenty good for low light hunting.
Quote from Sideshow on 06/22/2023, 03:19Medium load is i suppose a good name for them . Although my 45s velocity is under 2600 with 62gr H4198 and a 300 aeromax . This is what it shoots best . Its a barrel nut 700 so i couldnt even if i wanted to push the 300 faster . But honestly its plenty . I entertain no desires for more than that from it . It wears that Vortex 4×16 x40 and isnt a carry around rifle at all . It is a beauty on a bench however !
My current project will wear that Hawke WA 30mm 1.5x6x44 with 84 ft FOV . . Its a switch rig 54, 50 , 416 700ML . Only the 416 , 1 in 14 Wilson barrel is for smokeless with a Woodman Arms adjustable 209 , bushing bp . Woodman claims that plug will work up to 60k psi with 209s and .004″ crush fit . I wont push it that hard . Smooth sized .410 210gr Furys around 260O to 2700 maybe faster should be a easy 350++ yd very manageable recoil load from a 8 lb — scoped rifle with a 408/416 #5.5 sporter 26 inch barrel shooting flat as a pancake and burning CLEAN . That should be a pretty sexy woods , stalking , smaller open area rifle easily encompassing over 90% of whats truly needed to hunt with in most aeas . Just point and shoot . Balanced on the recoil lug it will handle like a Ferrari . Lighter annealed copper monos under 200gr will also be tried . Bullets as heavy as 250s or more jacketed are available in .410 too and i also have 280 , 330 , and 400 gr conicals from my 410 White Super 91 that will work with bh209 if id like . A 250 gr jacketed is just under 2400 with only 84grW of bh209 and the abiity for easily more . This will be a versitile inexpensive rig when done . Stainless and in a handsome curly tiger striped walnut skip-line checkered 700 adl stock . “Nostalgia” will be a unique muzzleloader able to hunt most anywhere and most anything with 3 calibers to choose from . A cheat sheet will put each barrel deadly close when switched in under 10 minutes . I will like this one Alot !!!
Medium load is i suppose a good name for them . Although my 45s velocity is under 2600 with 62gr H4198 and a 300 aeromax . This is what it shoots best . Its a barrel nut 700 so i couldnt even if i wanted to push the 300 faster . But honestly its plenty . I entertain no desires for more than that from it . It wears that Vortex 4×16 x40 and isnt a carry around rifle at all . It is a beauty on a bench however !
My current project will wear that Hawke WA 30mm 1.5x6x44 with 84 ft FOV . . Its a switch rig 54, 50 , 416 700ML . Only the 416 , 1 in 14 Wilson barrel is for smokeless with a Woodman Arms adjustable 209 , bushing bp . Woodman claims that plug will work up to 60k psi with 209s and .004″ crush fit . I wont push it that hard . Smooth sized .410 210gr Furys around 260O to 2700 maybe faster should be a easy 350++ yd very manageable recoil load from a 8 lb — scoped rifle with a 408/416 #5.5 sporter 26 inch barrel shooting flat as a pancake and burning CLEAN . That should be a pretty sexy woods , stalking , smaller open area rifle easily encompassing over 90% of whats truly needed to hunt with in most aeas . Just point and shoot . Balanced on the recoil lug it will handle like a Ferrari . Lighter annealed copper monos under 200gr will also be tried . Bullets as heavy as 250s or more jacketed are available in .410 too and i also have 280 , 330 , and 400 gr conicals from my 410 White Super 91 that will work with bh209 if id like . A 250 gr jacketed is just under 2400 with only 84grW of bh209 and the abiity for easily more . This will be a versitile inexpensive rig when done . Stainless and in a handsome curly tiger striped walnut skip-line checkered 700 adl stock . “Nostalgia” will be a unique muzzleloader able to hunt most anywhere and most anything with 3 calibers to choose from . A cheat sheet will put each barrel deadly close when switched in under 10 minutes . I will like this one Alot !!!
Quote from Sideshow on 06/26/2023, 03:47The GPO scopes i mentioned id like to put on a 40 that my parts pile needs modified . I have a Remington 40x action single shot but want a Defiance AnTi . The barrel is a Brux #6 with a 5 inch shank . I intend that to go back to Brux to be recontoured from a 1.246 shank to a 1.200 . Id also like the barrel reduced from 1 inch /.750 muzzle to .925/.725 muzzle . 10.5 lbs scoped is a bit more than im after . I want a further more powerfull punch and reach than the 700ml with a 416 is capable of but i dont want the weight . The action is expensive however !!! I want the ability of 275gr max to shoot 2900 to 3000 in a light package to use those GPO scopes more fully . I know this does contradict what ive previously said . This ones the hot rod and will also have a powder chamber . Thats the plan anyway . Id also like to recontour the 45s barrel from a #17 to a #6 . Theres really no acurracy loss and why carry the weight ?? Im not getting any younger .
The GPO scopes i mentioned id like to put on a 40 that my parts pile needs modified . I have a Remington 40x action single shot but want a Defiance AnTi . The barrel is a Brux #6 with a 5 inch shank . I intend that to go back to Brux to be recontoured from a 1.246 shank to a 1.200 . Id also like the barrel reduced from 1 inch /.750 muzzle to .925/.725 muzzle . 10.5 lbs scoped is a bit more than im after . I want a further more powerfull punch and reach than the 700ml with a 416 is capable of but i dont want the weight . The action is expensive however !!! I want the ability of 275gr max to shoot 2900 to 3000 in a light package to use those GPO scopes more fully . I know this does contradict what ive previously said . This ones the hot rod and will also have a powder chamber . Thats the plan anyway . Id also like to recontour the 45s barrel from a #17 to a #6 . Theres really no acurracy loss and why carry the weight ?? Im not getting any younger .
Quote from Ninering62 on 06/28/2023, 09:38My “Prefered scope”;
Wellll I can’t even come close to affording the kind of optics I want. It seems that in my learning from many yrs of using El Cheapo optics to learning about what real quality optics are & what they bring to the table vs 200-300.00 optics, I developed a champagne & caviar taste on a beer & slimjims budget.
As to ” favorites “, I do not & never have had a fav brand or specific scope, I’m more apt to have a fav for hunting, another fav for target shooting and another for another application.
I tend to prefer a SFP with excellent low light capabilities & a nice wide low end FOV for my hunting purposes.
Sideshow turned me on to GPO scopes a cpl yrs ago, I’ve seen nothing that compares to their quality, incredibly wide low end FOV, adjustability & low light capabilities even close to their price range. I’m beyond impressed with them, especially their Spectra 6 series & the Passion series. I want one really badly. Meopta is another awesome SFP hunting scope with quality & features beyond its cost.
I decided to get a Trijicon Credo 2.5-15×42 IRMOA scope for my .40 Omega SML which I just got word last Fri that I should have that back pretty soon. I think that will be a fantastic hunting scope on that gun.
I’ve been a big Shepherd scope fan for a cpl decades, had 3 of them. They bring quality & a lot of high end bells & whistles to the table for their price range too. Never an issue with either of them.
I just put a new Athlon Helos BTR Gen2 2-12×42 on my .45 Accura V2 & boy oh boy am I ever impressed & loving this scope, its overall quality & the much higher end features it has – for a very budget friendly price. I can see owning more than one of these scopes, seriously.
As to bench rest target scopes, I can’t afford what I want, but there are numerous 1000.00-2000.00ish FFP MOA scopes avail that I really like. I got a decent deal on the Vortex VIper Gen2 5-25×50 FFP IRMOA that I put on my Paramount. I could point out some things that – for what it costs normally, it should have more features & better quality, but its pretty good for what I’m using it for & what I could afford. Would I replace it if money were not an issue – yes, absolutely!
My “Prefered scope”;
Wellll I can’t even come close to affording the kind of optics I want. It seems that in my learning from many yrs of using El Cheapo optics to learning about what real quality optics are & what they bring to the table vs 200-300.00 optics, I developed a champagne & caviar taste on a beer & slimjims budget.
As to ” favorites “, I do not & never have had a fav brand or specific scope, I’m more apt to have a fav for hunting, another fav for target shooting and another for another application.
I tend to prefer a SFP with excellent low light capabilities & a nice wide low end FOV for my hunting purposes.
Sideshow turned me on to GPO scopes a cpl yrs ago, I’ve seen nothing that compares to their quality, incredibly wide low end FOV, adjustability & low light capabilities even close to their price range. I’m beyond impressed with them, especially their Spectra 6 series & the Passion series. I want one really badly. Meopta is another awesome SFP hunting scope with quality & features beyond its cost.
I decided to get a Trijicon Credo 2.5-15×42 IRMOA scope for my .40 Omega SML which I just got word last Fri that I should have that back pretty soon. I think that will be a fantastic hunting scope on that gun.
I’ve been a big Shepherd scope fan for a cpl decades, had 3 of them. They bring quality & a lot of high end bells & whistles to the table for their price range too. Never an issue with either of them.
I just put a new Athlon Helos BTR Gen2 2-12×42 on my .45 Accura V2 & boy oh boy am I ever impressed & loving this scope, its overall quality & the much higher end features it has – for a very budget friendly price. I can see owning more than one of these scopes, seriously.
As to bench rest target scopes, I can’t afford what I want, but there are numerous 1000.00-2000.00ish FFP MOA scopes avail that I really like. I got a decent deal on the Vortex VIper Gen2 5-25×50 FFP IRMOA that I put on my Paramount. I could point out some things that – for what it costs normally, it should have more features & better quality, but its pretty good for what I’m using it for & what I could afford. Would I replace it if money were not an issue – yes, absolutely!
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.